Just looking at the cover, I'd say it's definitely something more tailored to a Good Housekeeping audience than your typical Mother Earth News gardener. I still tune into the news from time to time and heard some comments about how the First Lady and her counterpart are both being interviewed by Good Housekeeping. Apparently, that's the way to reach the coveted female voters.

It's nice to hear your review, and to know that there's a little more substance that I expected(even if it's history and obesity challenges, rather than gardening). I occasionally venture into the the big box bookstore in town and I notice that the vast majority of gardening books being sold at the big chain stores are little more than coffee table books-- lots of mouthwatering pictures without much else.

Maggie --- Yeah, the staff really bothered me too. Multiple uniformed chefs and National Park Service employees to take care of a garden perhaps a fifth the size of my vegetables alone? Add in the volunteers (but discount the school kids, who might have done more harm than good), and I'd be surprised if the First Lady actually had a chance to do anything.

Sara --- The one good point about this book is that it's popular enough to hit even my podunk library, which means it's almost certainly in everyone else's. So, they can read without buying. (A good thing, since it's not worth $30.)

Personally, I am always impeccably coiffed when I garden.... And sometimes I am even changed out of my pajamas first. Lol! If we could simply remove the middle sections of the grocery store, and eat only from what is around the edges, we'd have much, much less obesity.
Thanks for the review... I wouldn't buy this book, but might browse it in the library.

Deb --- I try to wear pants without a huge hole in the seat, especially if Mark's taking photos.

Bob --- Yeah, I considered talking more about the foxes, because it is true they'll go after grapes and persimmons and so forth. But since her garden didn't have anything likely to be eaten by foxes, I didn't think she deserved that benefit of the doubt.

I'm totally with you on bemoaning the distance between people and good honest dirt!

Heath --- You made me laugh. I'm not going to get into real politics here, but I do think that it's pretty much impossible for a president to do much. I tend to give folks the benefit of the doubt, so I figure Obama went into the presidency naively believing he could really do what he said he was going to, but soon learned that's simply not how national politics work. I'm a believer in local politics as the only spot a real person (without mega bucks) can make a difference, but I'll still vote for the lesser of two evils in the presidential race since I'll be there voting for the little guys anyway.

MamaHomesteader --- I could have shortened my post considerably and said just what you said.

I think people are being a bit tough on Michelle. What she’s doing here is trying to bring attention to a cause and maybe to inspire other people to action. The fact that she even mentions the pawpaw suggests to me that she’s at least pointing people in the right direction.

Regarding the President, it’s what he’s actually done that‘s a problem: sign the Patriot Act, sign the NDAA, reappoint Bernanke, escalate the Afghanistan War and the Drone War, wage unconstitutional war in Libya, prosecute legal medical marijuana use and oversee a general increase Federal secrecy. It’s what the ACLU says about Obama, not what the GOP says, that really bothers me.

I’m voting for Gary Johnson.

BeninMA --- You're probably right about us being too hard on Michelle. That's why I added the caveat at the end --- because First Lady projects is a pet peeve of mine, so I might not be giving her enough benefit of the doubt.

I suspect Mark and I agree with you on all your reasons not to vote for Obama. But I still feel like we live in a two party system and can't expect a president to agree with us even 25% of the time. Since one of the two main contenders is going to win, I'd rather it was Obama since I suspect I'll agree with the alternative more like 5% of the time.

Anna -- Yes, that is the sad reality. I just vote based on principle -- at least I get a good night's sleep from that (kinda Thoreauvian too). And if more people did it, the politicians would catch on lightning fast.

But I understand that Democrats are in a difficult spot at this point. In 2016 I think there will be a push for "let's pick a real liberal this time."

Hey Anna, No politics, but I hope it is okay to ask a couple of questions. You don't have to answer if it's a hassle. First, when is the weekend homesteader book coming out? I know it's on preorder, I like to group shipments to take advantage of free shipping when. Possible. Second, how do you keep your outdoor worm bins from freezing in winter?
Third, do you have a particular kind of knife you've found useful for slaughtering chickens? Thanks

BeninMA --- Personally, what I would like is a no confidence vote option, the way real elections have. That way, people wouldn't feel like if they didn't vote for one of the big two, something worse would happen. If we all voted "no confidence", then we'd have to bring in a new set of candidates and try again. I hope you're right about a real liberal in 2016!

Deb --- Weekend Homesteader is due to come out November 13. Amazon might have changed their policy about preorders, though --- I preordered a book due to come out in December last night along with another book and they told me that the other book would ship right away. I'm not sure about that, but it would be nice if true since that often holds me back from preorders --- I don't want to wait to get the whole shipment until the book comes out.

About worm bins and freezing --- it's all about size. Since our worm bin is 8 feet by 4 feet by 1 foot, the worms can migrate to the center during cold weather. In a colder place, you might consider a worm bin built into the ground (which we considered, but figured would be overkill for our climate).

I use our best kitchen paring knife for chicken-killing, sharpened as much as possible. I suspect there's a better option, though, and would love to hear back from you if you find someone else with a real recommendation.

Read George Washington's farewell address and what he had to say about the two party system. Briefly, he said it would destroy America. I shake my head at those people who vote party lines. I don't. Vote for people with strong morale's and of good character.

Our news agencies are all morally bankrupt. They don't tell the truth about EITHER candidate. I'm of the opinion that more people would vote against #44 if they knew the truth about the man and the people who've influenced him during his life.

But at least you vote. You and I are among the minority in that aspect.