I've noticed that many environmentally
conscious eaters have a knee-jerk reaction against using genetically modified
organisms
(GMOs) in food. In my opinion, our food system is severely broken
and the current GMO system is broken too. But I think it's a
mistake to throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Humans have been selecting plants and animals which suit our needs for
thousands of years. Take a look at the teosinte ear on the left
compared to the modern ear of corn (or "maize" as the plant is known in
the rest of the world) on the right. By simple selective breeding
--- choosing the plants which produced the biggest ears and sweetest
kernels --- Native Americans were able to develop something
resembling the latter from the former seven thousand years ago.
In my opinion, producing GMOs is merely an acceleration of this
process.
Which is not to say that I'm
on board with the policies of the big GMO companies. The notion
of suing a Canadian farmer
for patent infringement when his canola crop was pollinated by a
neighbor's GMO canola is astounding. On the other hand --- did
you know that that Canadian farmer knowingly
seeded his entire field with the offspring of the few plants which
had been pollinated by the neighbor's plants rather than with seed from
the many other plants he'd grown?
In my opinion, GMO food has potential to cut back on pesticide use and
other environmental catastrophes associated with our current
agricultural system. In a perfect world, I'd rather see everyone
using organic, permaculture techniques in a food system based at the
community level, making pesticides irrelevant. But I think that
carefully regulated and tested GMO foods could be part of that
picture. All of us environmentally conscious consumers owe it to
ourselves and the legitimacy of our cause to carefully weigh the
pros and cons before swearing off GMO food.